← All use cases

Find safety signals earlier

Detect adverse event signals in literature

Safety NLP / LLMs Pilot Indirect

Natural language processing scans scientific literature and case reports to identify potential adverse-event information for safety review.

Medical information specialist assessing scientific evidence
(01) The opportunity

Why this use case matters.

Manual literature monitoring is time-intensive and can make it difficult to identify relevant safety information consistently at scale.

Faster review cycles, more consistent monitoring, and earlier attention to potential safety issues.

Primary user
Drug Safety Scientist
Business process
Literature monitoring and signal detection
Primary technology
Natural Language Processing / Large Language Models
Human responsibility
Review every candidate, determine reportability, and escalate through established safety processes
(02) How it works

From data to a human decision.

The technology supports a defined workflow. It does not replace the accountable professional.

01

Inputs and data

Scientific articles, case reports, and approved safety sources

02

AI capability

Classifies articles and extracts passages that may contain reportable safety information

03

Output and action

Prioritized articles and candidate signals for assessment

(03) Use case evaluation

Value versus effort.

This indicative view balances potential business value with the effort required to implement and operate the use case.

Selected use case Other use cases
(04) Responsible implementation

Risks and controls.

The value depends on a workflow that makes risk visible and preserves human accountability.

Risk areas

  • Missed signals
  • False positives
  • Privacy and source-data quality

Practical controls

  • Mandatory expert review
  • Validated source handling
  • Performance monitoring and documented escalation
Evaluate it in your context

Is this use case worth pursuing for your organization?

Let’s talk